Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zak Ettamymy

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zak Ettamymy


Per a search on a search engine, the subject of this draft may be notable, but this draft does not have any information useful enough to retain. Best delete this so that a more efficient draft can be created, if need be. Steel1943 (talk) 02:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Barely anything here. SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * http://www.lulu.com/shop/zak-ettamymy/reclaiming-the-universe/hardcover/product-22070880.html
 * On sale for almost one year, no reviews, no posts on its facebook page. Not sure why Steel think s it may be notable.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The submission has no chance as is, and is very unlikely to improve if it is a failed book. Why not let the G13 process take its course?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking at the history, I guess the G13 would have appeared 12 days after I placed the tag, but either way, both paths lead to the same resolution, so I am failing to see how nominating it for MFD is in the least bit problematic. (That, and this is part of some edits I take up from time-to-time to get the drafts out of the "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/" space and into the "Draft:" namespace if they have hope to become anything.) Steel1943  (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Understood. Delete now that we are here, but next time just let it go another 6 months to be deleted by G13.  The page has no content but the author and title of the book.  I'd have said keep if there were any hint of interest from a blog.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.