Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/UFC 155

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No consensus - the talk page is being used to discuss the process page, which is what it's there for - there's no real policy based argument for deletion. But it is probably pointless, so there's not much of a policy argument for keep. Which leaves it more or less a one to one headcount. Wily D 08:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/UFC 155


IP Editor making a case after the AfD has closed to argue for the keeping of a UFC event article. Per WP:TALKNO and WP:AFD this type of soapboxing after the AfD has been closed is inappropriate. I previously removed the content as it was not relevant to the deletion discussion, tagged with CSD:G6 on the grounds that it was non-contraversial and inappropriate for addition to a closed AfD discussion long after the fact. Administrator KWW removed and then restored the comments. Hasteur (talk) 18:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep While the discussion may not be particularly fruitful, I'm not aware of any policy that would support removal of this talk page.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:SOAPBOX is what the IP editor is attempting to do. Therefore it seems only logical that per the TALKNO/SOAPBOX guidelines the removal is endorsed. Having dealt with this same text showing up multiple times with the assumption that their keep will restore the page is a misuse of the AfD process and the pages associated with it. Hasteur (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Now a second user is jumping up and down on the soapbox extoling the virtues of UFC 155 by posting a reasoning on the AfD talk page after the AfD is closed. Hasteur (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.