Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Ebe123

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy delete by  as an attack page. Cunard (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Ebe123
All context on this page was copied from the Editor Review. The context was deleted by the subject of the Editor review (User:Ebe123) with suggestion 4 by User:Floquenbeam here EBE123  talkContribs 21:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd have been inclined to ignore this, EBE, as I've said elsewhere. But if it bothers you this much, then I'd say delete, since reposting the comments in such a visible way serves no useful purpose.  The edits are still in the page history of the editor review itself.  This is not an RFA; the purpose of an editor review is to provide feedback to an editor, not to make sure everyone knows what you think of an editor.  EBE has read them, found them offensive, and blanked them from the editor review.  I can think of no benefit to the project in posting them on the talk page, or unblanking them from the editor review page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I've speedily deleted it as an attack page, as that was clearly User:Promethean's intent. Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.