Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Proposed decision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. — xaosflux  Talk  01:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Proposed decision
This page appears to have been created by a Saladin1970 (or a loyal user) sock (the creator has no other edits) as a mock voting page for pro-Saladin remedies. I have also requested CheckUser on the creator of this page. Editor88 01:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Generally I would let the arbitration committee decide to do with this subpage of Saladin1970's case.  The fact that "someone" would go to the trouble to make this point may even have some bearing on the outcome. Thatcher131 02:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep A cryptic criticism. Fred Bauder 04:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll be very interested in this once Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Saladin1970 is complete. But Keep if a member of ArbCom, bauder, thinks it should be kept. Kevin_b_er 07:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Checkuser was declined on the basis that the arbitrators can run their own checks if they feel its necessary. Thatcher131 11:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.