Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy keep WP:SKCRIT - This is in effect a request to move Wikipedia talk:About the Sandbox to Wikipedia talk:Sandbox. Move requests belong at WP:RM, not here. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 14:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Sandbox


Barely-used; should be replaced with actual talk page. Kamafa Delgato (Lojbanist)Styrofoam is not made from kittens. 04:50, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean "barely-used"?? I looked at the history and see dozens of edits and tests done on that talk page throughout October 2018 at least. What usage metric are you considering? Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  05:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nonsense nomination.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. No valid reason for deletion. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Page is in use by multiple editors and bots. CoolSkittle  (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Even if this was converted to a traditional talk page, there would be no reason to obscure the history from view through deletion. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Argument appears to be WP:USELESS, not being edited in the day before nomination is not "barely-used" (If this applied to stuff like administrator inactivity, we would have very few admins. And probably not enough bureaucrats to desysop them all.) SemiHypercube ✎ 21:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.