Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan/Temple

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 03:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan/Temple
Random collection of material from various pages, some of it quite disturbing (particularly the WalesxWikipetan story, which IIRC was deleted elsewhere). It's pointless and in poor taste, and not in any way helpful to the encyclopedia. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. This appears to be a talk page for a non-existent Wikipe-tan/Temple. Why was it created? -- Klein zach  04:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone at some time chose to make it for fun I assume, the last edit before deletion was in 2009 (Not even any bot edits since) so this page has alot of dust on it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 11:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Burn with fire this serves no purpose what so ever and the WalesxWikipetan story is far too smutty to be encyclopedic. We are not the web-host for your erotica. --Guerillero &#124; My Talk   16:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't really tell what the original purpose of this was supposed to be, but it clearly has no place in an encyclopedia. Is this just a forum for somewhat disturbing fan fiction and fawning over the character? Yaksar (let's chat) 21:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Klein zach  23:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-productive and off-putting to many editors. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. This disturbing story that is offputting to some editors is linked elsewhere on wikipedia as well through humor pages, should that version of the revision history be deleted as well then? Based on this I can see why Jimbo would not be a fan of wikipe-tan =.= - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 12:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you give some examples of where it's linked from? I saw the original subpage devoted to the story, but I thought that was deleted a while ago...Nikkimaria (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * See: User:Jimbo Wales/Funny pictures under "Jimbo with suspected love interest Wikipe-tan." not a huge deal as the caption can be changed but the story is also used on user pages as well. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If these comments originally came from Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan, then it should be merged back into the talk page or one of its archives. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I see it now I think these may have been replies that were orginally in the talk page but were taken out top form a humor page. If that is the case as said a merge would be best here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge back into Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan's archives per above, the evidence is in the history, if you look at Revision as of 00:09, 28 September 2006 in the history and compare it to the earliest archive Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan/Archive 1 you will find sections missing in the archive. - Merge done, I found that this page was created on October 10, 2006 so any information before that date I placed back into the first archive (which was not much or that much of a diffrence). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Now that the content is merged (What I could merge). While I am a fan of wikipe-tan I do not see how this page can be on wikipedia, on a fan blog maybe but not here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 気持ち悪い Delete as hard and fast as possible. When I was thirteen I thought my comments were funny. I can now see that they were most definitely not. Nobody needs to read that ever. ZigSaw 17:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.