Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wrestling fan pages




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  deleted except 09nick  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 08:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Wrestling fan pages

 * User:ECWfan2009
 * User:WWEdude905
 * User:Ilikeapie
 * User:WWEClassicFan09
 * User:WorldWrestlingEntertainmentfan09
 * User:KOolAiDMAnV1
 * User:NWOfan09
 * User:DVG991 - indef blocked for "using Wikipedia as a free host"
 * User:09nick

These pages all consist of wrestling fans' recordings of various wrestling matches. Each is maintained by an editor who has no (or very few) other edits to Wikipedia. These editors are not here to build the encyclopedia, but rather to use Wikipedia as a webhost. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST, these pages should be deleted. Peacock (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: See also Sockpuppet investigations/Ilikeapie. Peacock (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete User:KOolAiDMAnV1, User:DVG991, and User:09nick. All three Both users are/were using Wikipedia as a free webhost, and Wikipedia is not a webhost. Keep User:09nick as it now complies with policy. Keep all others as they now consist solely of CheckedSockpuppet. Add Sockpuppeteer to User:Ilikeapie and keep it blanked otherwise. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: No Way should my userpage be deleted, I created four pages which have now expanded and improved on several, a userpage is just a userpage and my userpage is MY own buisness!--09nick (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Can I just ask one question: Why should my userpage be deleted because it shows various wrestling matches, yes I am a fan of WWE but just because of that doesn't mean I don't help Wikipedia from time to time, and by the way User:A Stop at Willoughby I'm not using Wikipedia as a free webhost, and how is my userpage any different from anyone elses? It shows information about the user and how they can build the encyclopedia: I like wrestling is the main point and will expand on wrestling related articles. If this is effecting anyone at Wikipedia I apologize for the misleading and that I am a proud user of Wikipedia.org.--09nick (talk) 20:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Quite simply, you are most definitely using Wikipedia as a free host. If you have useful content to add to articles, fine but using user pages as a notepad is not allowed. &mdash; RHaworth 20:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Delete all and salt. We await 09nick's contributions to the (article) namespace. &mdash; RHaworth 20:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Understanding I know understand, if I delete everything notepad related to my userpage, will I be excluded from this affair?--09nick (talk) 23:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thanks for changing it to comply with policy. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep (User:09nick) for now. User:09nick appears to have got the message, which really should have been put more amicably.  Userspace should not be deleted without at least a templated notification on the user's talk page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * As per Black Falcon in regard to the other pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete User:DVG991 as the user page of an indef-blocked user who was using Wikipedia as a webhost. Weak delete (or blank and notify) User:KOolAiDMAnV1, who is using Wikipedia as a webhost but also has edited the article namespace. Keep User:09nick as modified: while I understand why 09nick's user page was nominated along with the others (the sockpuppet investigation request), 09nick has made edits to the article namespace. Especially now that the page has been modified, there is no valid reason to delete it. Keep the rest with Sockpuppeteer and CheckedSockpuppet. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 18:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.