Wikipedia:Neutrality Project/Declined

{| style="float: left; width: 100%; align: right" cellspacing=5 cellpadding=10
 * style="color: white; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 20px;" align="left" bgcolor=#999 | Declined Requests
 * align="left" style="background: #FFE; border:2px solid #999; font-size: 100%; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 20px;"|
 * align="left" style="background: #FFE; border:2px solid #999; font-size: 100%; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 20px;"|

OGOH IZANL#E

''Hello. My request is about yadavas of devagiri, rashtrakuta, chalukyas, gangas but not limited to it.Plz tell me the appropriate place to complain if this is not the one. Mr.Kannambadi is using a strong rationalistic partisan book to create articles. The author clearly has soft corner for Karnataka and terms every great dynasty of being Karnataka origin. I questioned kannada origin of yadavas and later got flamed. I was later blocked many times for being a sock-puppet of my collegue sarvabhaum. After which i requested him to stop editing wikipedia. Yet I am blocked again. After consideration i did credit that controversial author in yadavas who according to me is Maratha origin. But when I started using Marathi books on other articles my edits were blatantly removed despite several requests displaying prejudice against my authors and regions. If he dont want to accept my authors in rashtrakuta, chalukya etc why should he insist on his addition at yadavas? In a nutshell, my problem is that Mr.Kannambadi is using a partisan author to edit articles in wikipedia but if i use authors of my language and my state he flames me. The partisan author writes in english but that doesnt mean his book is pristine and NPOV. plz advice here itself. 59.95.22.176 08:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)''' 59.95.22.176 08:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined &bull; The Wikipedia Neutrality Project is not a dispute resolution avenue. Please consider mediation. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge  (  Talk to Me  &bull;  Neutrality Project  ) 19:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

, and
Articles created by an Albanian editor I recently warned. I do not personally have the time to work on these articles but I would appreciate someone else's involvement. A quick read will show anyone the tone is extremely POV. Thanks and regards, Asterion talk 19:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have edited the Podujevo massacre article myself and I think the result is NPOV. Any second opinion is always welcome plus the other two still need a lot of work done. Regards, Asterion talk 21:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)