Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reports/Easy reviews

Unreviewed articles marked for AFD
Check for copyvio, then mark as reviewed. The community will decide its notability.

Probable DB-R2 candidates
Draftified articles where folks might have forgotten to tag the redirect with Db-r2. Add the tag. Do not mark as reviewed.

No items retrieved.

Probable DB-error (G6) candidates
A list of pages moved from User:Thisismyname/MyArticlename to Thisismyname/MyArticlename. The fix is to do a page move to get rid of Thisismyname/, tag the mainspace redirect for deletion using G6 Db-error, and change the target of the userspace redirect.

No items retrieved.

Unreviewed disambiguation pages
These are easy, if you are familiar with how disambiguation pages are supposed to be formatted, and when a series of articles should get a disambiguation page.

Unreviewed species articles
Species are an unwritten SNG. They are always kept at AFD, so you can assume they are notable. Make sure it's not a hoax by checking the species name on a website such as CoL.

Unreviewed politicians
Politician articles can be easier than normal because it is easy for a national-level or state-level politician to pass WP:NPOL. They simply need to be in a legislature, the executive cabinet, or the supreme court. There are some countries whose state-level politicians do not qualify under NPOL; these are discussed at Notability (people)/Subnational politicians. Folks who have not won their election yet do not pass NPOL, but you can always check GNG to see if they pass that way. Mayors have to pass GNG too.

Probable "draftify because of no sources" candidates
It is common practice to draftify mainspace articles with no sources. However, be careful of general references sections (these count as sources), disambiguation pages including surname pages (because these do not need sources), and lists (these may not need sources immediately). If it is a WP:BLP with no sources, you should WP:BLPPROD instead.

Unreviewed AFC-accepted articles
These have already been reviewed by an AFC reviewer, and are therefore more likely to be notable and policy-compliant, assuming that the AFC reviewer did a good job.