Wikipedia:Peer review/1913 Liberty Head Nickel/archive1

1913 Liberty Head Nickel
I'm interested in bringing this article (most of which I wrote) up to featured article status. At this point, I think it is well-written, well-formatted, and well-sourced. I'm interested in any comments, criticisms, or suggestions before posting this on WP:FAC. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 17:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The intro could do with being longer, and it would be good, where it says "there are several methods by which the coin could have been legitimately produced", to give a couple of examples. Laïka  10:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I added two examples of Bowers' opinion as to how the coin could legitimately have been produced. As for the intro, I agree a longer one would be nice, but I'm having trouble thinking of how to expand it without adding redundancy with other sections of the article. Any suggestions? Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 02:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You could add a little bit about the early history of the coin (possibility of clandestine production etc), although having read through the article again, I agree that it is difficult to avoid just repeating yourself. Laïka  06:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)