Wikipedia:Peer review/2008 World Monuments Watch List of Most Endangered Sites/archive1

2008 World Monuments Watch List of Most Endangered Sites
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would like the work of World Monuments Fund to be featured more and in preparation for the release of the 2010 version this fall season. I have created this article and developed its format. This is the first time I'm requesting a peer review, and hope that feedback will be positive. I'm currently working on re-formating the other listings of similar nature to this one.

Thanks, Joey80 (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Comments from Niagara


 * Flagicons shouldn't be used per WP:MOSICON
 * Every field should be filled, even if its repeating because if the sorting feature is used in the table, rows that were once next to each other, no longer are.
 * Date ranges should have an En dash between them, instead of hyphens, per WP:MOSDASH
 * Each entry in the "Remarks" column should begin with a capital letter.
 * The "Notes" section should have a 2nd level heading ( == == ) and be above the "References" section.
 * No blank lines between each of the individual notes
 * Not really an issue, maybe more of a personal preference, but I'd retitle the "Remarks" column as "Notes"
 * The quotation is nice, but is the yellow color necessary. Personally, I typically like to use the Rquote for pull-quotes.

I note that the 2006 list is also up for peer review. The comments provided here would probably be useful / relevant there were copied there as well. If you find these comments useful consider reviewing an article listed in the backlog (which is how I found this article). ​​​​​​ ​​ Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 03:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * , thanks for the comments. Joey80 (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)