Wikipedia:Peer review/82nd Academy Awards/archive1

82nd Academy Awards
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because this list could be a FL and I want to know what is wrong.

Thanks, Tb hotch Ta lk C. 05:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Everything seems to be in order with the article/list; but a few references are not properly formatted and reference number 26 does not seem to be a reliable source and reference number 7 (Digital Spy) is not considered a reliable source. Also in the "Submitted films qualified for consideration for nomination" section I think it would be easier to read without the red link and I also think the article/lists lead does not completely summarize the pages content, the page is over 76 bytes long so the lead should be about three paragraphs long. Granted, I haven't gone over this article word for word so there could be other problems with this article that I can not identify. Other then the problems I've listed, this article appears to be FL status. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 09:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * number 26 does not seem to be a reliable source — I'll ask to other users
 * reference number 7 (Digital Spy) is not considered a reliable source — ✅ changed to Telegraph Daily
 * the lead should be about three paragraphs long. — I think it's ✅


 * Thanks Crystal. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 05:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Your welcome : ) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 08:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)