Wikipedia:Peer review/Aapravasi Ghat/archive1

Aapravasi Ghat
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review I'd like to nominate it as a WP:FAC. There is a current lack of representation of Mauritian articles, hence, what could be a better article than one that is related to Mauritius' history, society and politics&mdash;all in one article. This is also my first full article for peer review. My previous ones were mostly focused on listings.

Thanks, Joey80 (talk) 03:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Before you go for a FAC, IMO go for a WP:GAC (Good article) and evaluate the article in accordance with WP:GA? criteria. References: Coverage: The article seems less like an article on a building complex, architecture.
 * Questionable reliability: See WP:RS
 * 4: is a blog
 * Missing author, publisher info:
 * The Caribbean". http://www.indiandiaspora.nic.in/diasporapdf/chapter15.pdf. Retrieved 11 September 2009. (2)
 * World history: a new perspective. 2000, p. 353.(11)
 * "Indendutred Systems of labour Migration". http://ignca.nic.in/id_indentured_001.htm. Retrieved 11 September 2009. (12)
 * 13
 * 14
 * There is too much "Background" (otherwise History is fine). There should be a distinction between text about the structure and text generally written about Indians working as labourers in Mauritius. Reduce or remove the latter part as relevant only to a certain extent - to the building itself. Legacy is almost a complete WP:UNDUE and major parts of the section are best removed. The section mostly deals with Legacy of the immigration. Condense all that background material in a single section called "History"
 * Write more about the interior and exterior architecture of the building
 * More images of interior and exterior needed. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)