Wikipedia:Peer review/Alamos Gold/archive1

Alamos Gold


I've listed this article for peer review because the article has expanded significantly, including some content that appears to be of questionable relevance and reliability. Assistance in identifying the material that should stay and material that should go would be appreciated.

Thanks, RoanokeVirginia (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I agree with your assessment. A lot of the content is about things like when permits were issued, when construction began, etc. It may be better to completely remove things about permits and what not, and roll the construction and stuff into the relevant mines that are operated. The overall timeline could be summarised with just the very major points in a paragraph or two. Lastly, several parts o the article remain without citations that can be used to verify the content. Cheers, Tom (LT) (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)