Wikipedia:Peer review/Alliance for the Future of Austria/archive1

Alliance for the Future of Austria
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make the article a "good" one.

Thanks, Xt-3 (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll try to do a peer review of this in the next few days. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * At first glance, the best thing you could do would be to add more citations. Shoot for at least one per paragraph. In my experience, Google News is a good way to find articles to cite.
 * It would probably be a good idea to translate all the non-English text in the article.
 * The references should usually come right after the punctuation at the end of the sentence being cited.
 * I'm not sure the lead section lines up with the WP:LEAD guideline. The lead should summarize the text, there shouldn't be anything in the article that isn't broadly summarized in the lead.
 * I'm curious about the use of the coordinates in article, is 46.582389,14.28275 the location of their headquarters?
 * I'm not sure if all the small sections are a good idea, maybe try to expand or condense them? Mark Arsten (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Mark, I know its not so easy on peer reviewing articles that are based on Austrian topics ,but I appreciate your support. Abut the coordinates, no they aren't. The closets is LAT: 48.205928 LON: 16.357913 Ok I could try to do some translation work it needs some time,but I can do that. Good idea the sections could get cut down if needed in other cased maybe its better to expand.

Lets do that.

The best thing would remove the coordinates first. I'm gonna do that now. --Xt-3 (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It would also be a good idea to look at other Good Articles on political parties to see how they handle structure and content, like Freedom Party of Austria or Centre Democrats (Netherlands). You could try talking with people who have improved European political articles, as well. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks I'm looking forward to do that. --Xt-3 (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)