Wikipedia:Peer review/Alternative history (fiction)/archive1

Alternative history (fiction)
I have been in an ongoing reversion with another user and we have fundamental differences of opinion. Several people have made changes in addition to ours, yet the other user keep insisting that his changes are correct (as do I), although he is ignoring most of the things people say that disagree with him.

I have cited several sources in support of my contention, both in the article and on the talk page and he has not responded to any of my (or other people's) citations. I won't get into the substance of the arguments because I don't want to be accused of misrepresenting them, although they can be read on the talk and in the history pages.Shsilver 19:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to put you off, but I'm afraid this is the wrong place for your problem, please see the instructions at the top of the page. Requests for comment is the best page for content disputes. Could you move the article there, please? You'll get better feedback from RFC, as readers of Peer review aren't expecting to take on disputes. Bishonen | talk 22:56, 12 July 2005 (UTC)


 * ...testing. :) &mdash; RJH 16:03, 13 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Yeah, well. I also posted a message on User talk:Shsilver, but have had no response to any of it, although the user has been around, editing. I will now move the article myself. Bishonen | talk 14:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)