Wikipedia:Peer review/American Dad! (season 4)/archive1

American Dad! (season 4)
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I am wanting to bump it up to a Featured List candidate. It looks fine for the most part, but I am looking for other opinions and to see if I need to fix anything.

Thanks, DAP388 (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2011
 * I asked a couple of WP:DOH members to weigh in...the article is great, you might be ready now...I'll read it over tomorrow. C T J F 8 3  00:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I made a few minor edits and have the following suggestions:
 * "including incest, the coming out aspect of homosexuality, and appeal to fear propaganda." Perhaps describe what the fear propaganda refers to specifically
 * ✅ Added more to it.
 * Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead generally doesn't contain references, as they should all be in the body of the article
 * ✅ I have placed all the references in the body. DAP388 (talk)  20:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "The character of Sidney—a persona of Roger", while I can't remember specifics on every episode, I don't remember any of Roger's personas being in more than 1 episode, so I don't see a reason to list this, especially cause he is voiced by MacFarlane
 * I think this is important because, while all of Roger's other personas don't really serve anything other than giving off pop culture references, this persona served as a major protagonist of the episode. DAP388 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "The total viewership for the episode significantly increased from the third season premiere, which was viewed by 6.07 million viewers upon its original airing." Is an increase of 820,000 viewers significant?
 * I think an increase of 500,000 viewers or more is viewed as a significant jump. DAP388 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The Parents Television Council part of the "reception" section contains no more info then the lead does. Can you expand it in the reception or cut some of the detail in the lead
 * ✅ Added a little more to it. DAP388 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Over all a great job! C T J F 8 3  01:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. :) DAP388 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)