Wikipedia:Peer review/Art Data Interactive/archive1

Art Data Interactive


This is the first B level article I've put together where I've compiled several sources to form a comprehensive summary of a topic. Because there's a lot of content, I'd like to know if I'm on the right track with conforming with GA standards, and would like some help with identifying where I can develop my skills better when drafting against Wikipedia's good article conventions.

Thanks, Vrxces (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720
Here are some comments after a quick skim:
 * The lede should be expanded to include a summary of the major topics mentioned in the article.
 * There should be a citation at the end of each paragraph, minimum.
 * A lot of the article is about the games, and not necessarily about the company. I suggest reading Namco, one of Wikipedia's featured articles, and structure this article similarly.
 * Dissolution needs more information. Why was the company dissolved?
 * Unreleased projects can be merged together to avoid WP:OVERSECTION or just removed.
 * IMDB cannot be used as a source.
 * Not sure if ref 9 is a reliable source

Hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * to ensure they saw the above. Z1720 (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Since the nominator has not responded to the above ping, I am going to close this PR. A new PR can be opened when the above are considered for the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)