Wikipedia:Peer review/Atomic theory/archive1

Atomic theory
Kurzon 19:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes it looks good. Nothing additional springs to mind in terms of content, since subatomic particles and quantum models of the atom are covered in greater detail by other articles.
 * Normally the introduction should provide a brief summary of the article.
 * There are only three inline citations and the article could use many more.
 * The article should clarify that "90 degrees" is an angle, rather than a temperature.
 * In the final section about quantum models, please use &amp;mdash; rather than a hyphen for the em dash punctuation.
 * Thanks. &mdash; RJH (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 03:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)