Wikipedia:Peer review/BBL controversy/archive1

BBL controversy
I've listed this article for peer review because… I would really like feedback from uninterested parties on this topic. The article is all about the controversey surrounding a given scientific theory of transsexualism, where the controversey took on a life of it's own. For example, there are people who would take vehement offence to the use of the phrase "scientific theory" in relation to this topic. Hence I feel a need for a peer reivew by uninterested parties. I have tried to be neutral and as fair as possible to everyone. I want to know if others also think this article is truly NPOV. I also want to know if there are any suggestions on how I could describe the ad hominem arguements, in a shorter form, while not seeming to take sides. So far I have used quotes, perhaps I should summarize and paraphrase? Any suggestions at all would be taken and followed.

Thanks,

Hfarmer 01:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 17:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)