Wikipedia:Peer review/Baby Gender Mentor/archive1

Baby Gender Mentor
I would appreciate any and all additional feedback on this article. The article has previously had a peer review which was very helpful. Following the peer review, and with some more work and discussion, the article was recognized as a Good Article. I've done some more work and reviewed the Featured Article criteria, and I believe the article now meets FA standards. Before submitting it for FA, I would like to solicit other opinions about what could be improved. I welcome your feedback on the article. Best, Johntex\talk 05:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Overall, a very good article. A couple small points:
 * Last paragraph in the lead needs citations.
 * Last paragraph in the "Accuracy of the test disputed" section needs some punctuation corrections.
 * Reword the opening few sentences in "About AcuGen." They don't flow well to me, since they both are so short. Maybe something like your opening, "AcuGen is a biotech company in Mass and is led by Cheng Wang, the company's President." Or something like that.
 * Other than that, to me, it meets all criteria of WP:WIAFA. Well written, comprehensive, stable, accurate, neutral.--NMajdan &bull;talk 18:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much Nmajdan. I will work on the above points.  I am just about to finish reviewing University of Oklahoma for you. Johntex\talk 03:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again, Nmajdan. I have now made the changes you suggest above.  I am hopeful to receive additional comments if anyone has time. Johntex\talk 05:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)