Wikipedia:Peer review/Backgammon/archive2

Backgammon

 * First review: Peer review/Backgammon/archive1

I am hoping to nominate this article for FA within the next few weeks, but I believe it still needs some work before going there. I would appreciate any comments or suggestions so I can take care of them before then. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 15:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Very nice article, I loved this game as a kid but never quite understood the doubling cube before (and I remember re-reading "Hoyles" three times trying to figure it out). My only real concern is the lack of information under vareties is at odds with multitude of information given under history. These games either are similar to Backgammon to deserve being covered by the article or they are not.  They cannot be derserving of detailed coverage in one area and not the other.-- Birgitte§β  ʈ  Talk  20:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I think the best solution to this problem of balance might be to discuss some of the more backgammon-like variants here in the article. I'll see about coming up with a couple of paragraphs there. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 20:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 02:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)