Wikipedia:Peer review/Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina/archive1

Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina


I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see it get to at least B standard before the final judgement in the case (due in March/April 2022), then somewhere close to FA at some point there after. What filling out does it need? Referencing? Media? Tags? Indobox data?

Thanks, RockerballAustralia (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)


 * It looks like added clean-up banners to the top of the article. I suggest reaching out to them if you need more details on how to rectify their concerns. As PRs shouldn't have major clean-up banners at the top of the article, I am going to close this PR. Once the banners have been addressed and removed, you may open up another PR. Z1720 (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)