Wikipedia:Peer review/Battle of the Scheldt/archive1

Battle of the Scheldt
I find it is a good article about an important yet not very well known battle of WWII, but most of the article was made by one person, Oldsoul, with minor changes by me and a couple other people, so I think it really needs more people to look over it, especially people who did not make it. I know references are missing, but I cannot get the formatting right to do them, I have tried, but kept failing.say1988 17:39, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * I came across this article when I was working on Military history of Canada and I was much impressed. There are still some barriers to it being featured, however. As mentioned it needs a references section. For aid you might look to other pages and copy the format they have used. One well referenced page I have been working on recently is Makuria. Also important is that the photos need more description. They seem to come from the National Archives, which is very good at properly documenting images. Ideally for each of them we should have the accession number, and reproduction number so they can easily be looked up. A link to the Archive's image description page, rather than just the image, is also important. The Archives are always explicit about copyright status, and we should be just as direct. For some well document images from the Canadian Archives see Image:Trudeau at the 1968 Liberal convention.jpg and Image:Vimy tank.jpg. A third, relatively minor, issue is that there are too many short paragraphs that should be merged together. - SimonP 04:08, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for starting this page. It took me three or four days to pull together the bulk of this article. I've just posted a response to the talk page which addresses my current concerns. Chief of which is that many of the paragraphs now read too long in my opinion, and many details and descriptions may serve the overall article well to be shortened somewhat. In any case, the more minds the better on this one, I know we are all in it for the right reasons. Here's to FA status... Oldsoul 10:22, August 9, 2005 (UTC)