Wikipedia:Peer review/Bhagavad Gita/archive2

Bhagavad Gita
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because a lot of work has been done on the content, citations and NPOV issues in the article, recently. I would like to iron out any more issues before this is taken to GAR.
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, CorrectKnowledge (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

-- Tito Dutta  ✉  15:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comments from Tito Dutta
 * Some refs need to be expanded, add ISBN publisher etc. We can use Harvnb or sfn ref style! Yes check.svg Y Done
 * Ref 39 ref format should be corrected Yes check.svg Y Done
 * Thanks for the barnstar. So, what do you think? Is the article up to the GAR mark yet? CorrectKnowledge (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What do you think? -- Tito Dutta  ✉  18:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I think it is good enough for FAR. :) Yeah, to me it looks good enough for a GA status. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Go ahead then! I hope someone'll pick the article quickly before my Wikibreak so that I can join the GA discussion! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  18:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added the GAN template in Talk:Bhagavad Gita. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 18:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd be greatly surprised if the article makes it to the GA status. It's a good try, but, IMHO, it still requires a great deal of work on its content, structure, style, and even punctuation, to become eligible as a GAN. If I were you I would not rush it to the nomination yet. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 04:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * To my mind, the use of images is a little messy; they are all bunched up on the right hand side and near the top. Could they be redistributed in a more elegant manner ? Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thank you for pointing that out. I have moved the images so that they appear to be evenly distributed across the page. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  04:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)