Wikipedia:Peer review/Bill Clinton/archive1

Bill Clinton
I'd like to nominate this for featured status, but I want to make sure it's good enough. What needs to be done? [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 19:19, 2004 Aug 13 (UTC)


 * The ==Presidency== section could use some condensing and the detail moved to Clinton Administration. The same thing was already done with Ronald Reagan/Reagan Administration. --mav 03:36, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * It's quite good. I would agree with mav and say the Administration table absolutely needs to go into a separate article.  Additionally I'd like to see more on the platforms he proposed in campaign and especially in the beginning of his presidency.  He is notable for being one of the presidents with the fewest platforms he proposed getting accomplished. Notably his national health care and all other major proposals that I can recall being unsuccessful. - Taxman 17:00, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)

I don't know if this is worth adding to the article but I will note about Bill Clinton's skin problems (redness) caused by Rosacea that plagued him throught the end of his term in office.--Clawed 12:09, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Bill Clinton
I'd like to see the ===Impeachment and controversies=== section of the Clinton article containing mention of the impeachment to have something pointing up the "get Clinton" aspects of the Ken Starr led persecution. I am a Socialist and didn't vote for Clinton either time, lest someone think I am defending him, I'm not. I do defend complete disclosure on Wikipedia and ommission of the amount of money and time chasing largely illusory complaints is a glaring ommission to the neutrality and completeness of the Clinton entry. Since I'm not an authority on Clinton, I request others who may have less disdain for the man to do this addition as I don't trust myself to keep my disdain from showing.--IdioT.SavanT.i4 2:48, 01 February 2006