Wikipedia:Peer review/Black Marsh/archive1

Black Marsh
I've been developing this article for some time, following recommendations from Wikiproject Elder Scrolls, a previous Peer Review, and a Good Article nomination. The article is now a Good Article, and as the other sources have run dry in recommendations, I'd like to request comments here before moving forward. Any criticism or comment is welcome. Thank you. Geuiwogbil 05:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2007-01-11 15:12
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * Made some changes, increased length, took some cites down to the main body. Geuiwogbil 20:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Consider adding more links to the article; per Manual of Style (links) and Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
 * See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
 * Given the nature of the region as a commercial production, there can be not free use images. I did, however, move the fair use map up to the top right. (Although I'm not sure if it should be put on the same level as the disambiguation tag or beneath it.) Geuiwogbil 20:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * There isn't! Geuiwogbil 20:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This article does not have any categories. Please categorize it with relevant.
 * I really can't think of any cats we want in here beyond those in the already installed hierarchy. Geuiwogbil 20:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Avoid using contractions like: doesn't, hasn't.
 * Contractions are all in quotations. Geuiwogbil 20:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]