Wikipedia:Peer review/Blackwater Worldwide/archive1

Blackwater Worldwide
I've put down Blackwater Worldwide for peer review, for the process of eventually getting to the level of a Featured Article. I'm aware of some defects in the article (some writing structure, formatting of the sources is only about 50% complete), but wanted to get the process started to expedite the improvement of the article. The talk page and activities from other editors has dropped off, I suspect from them not being in the news each day now, but I still wanted to run with it for FA. Thanks for any assistance, Lawrence Cohen  20:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 01:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me so far. Someone does need to go through all of the references and make sure they all have the necessary information because some them are just links to an article.  It also might help if there was some more organization in the external links section.  Finally, someone should make sure that all books referenced in the article have the applicable ISBN numbers listed.  But that is pretty much all I saw in one read.  I made a couple of small changes but other than the suggestions above it looks good to me (but I am new at reviewing articles so maybe I am missing something). Remember (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm still going through all the sources to standardize them. It took me about 3-4 days to do it on another article with half as many, so probably by next week I'll have them all caught up. Lawrence Cohen  16:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)