Wikipedia:Peer review/Blue Harvest (Family Guy)/archive1

Blue Harvest (Family Guy)
I think this page already looks good already. I just want to see what can be done to improve the article further. The episode is pretty notable to Family Guy itself, so it would be good to improve it. Hopefully with this, I (or we at WP:FG) will be able to improve what is needed to bring the article to GA status... or ultimately, FA status. T he  C hronic  00:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I just did a quickie review of it, and I think you are a ways off from GA status. The plot section goes into way too much detail about miniscule things and one-off jokes, there are no references whatsoever for the cultural references section or the cast section, and only one for the notes section. So, sourcing and the plot section are the two biggest issues right now. You will probably have to wait for the DVD release before you can have a sufficient and well-sourced production/notes and cultural refs section. As well, the image needs a fair use rationale. -- Scorpion0422 00:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay. I'll try to do my best to re-word the plot, cultural references and cast section. I'll try to find more references. As for the image, (I'm not sure, but) it looks like it has an appropriate tag. And it looks like it's sized to standards. If I'm wrong, sorry. Thanks for the insight. T he  C hronic  00:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It has the right tag, but it needs a fair use rationale. As well, I can't help but wonder if the plot section is really needed because once you remove the jokes, it's basically the Star Wars plot (except for a few minor details), so perhaps it isn't needed. -- Scorpion0422 00:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm not that familiar with the image policy (I don't upload images anyways). As for the plot, I'll work on talking out un-necessary points. I'll be working on the overall article on my my sandbox. T he   C hronic  00:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I fixed up the "Plot" section. I just wanna see what other people think of it, compare to the one on the main page. (find it in my sandbox, link above). T he  C hronic  05:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 13:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)