Wikipedia:Peer review/Bohemian Rhapsody/archive1

Bohemian Rhapsody
Review for "good article" criteria.--Miketm 20:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the article could do with a few more inline citations (especially for the Trivia section), and I don't see why the "Song structure"-section had to be put on a different page. Other than that, the article has a properly formatted infobox, is lengthy enough (yet not too long) and has a decent prose. So yeah, it's close but no fire. —♦♦ SʘʘTHING  (Я)  07:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know who put the "Song structure" on a different page. I have put it back in the article.--Miketm 19:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 23:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * As someone with no familiarity with the recording process (though a huge fan of the song) I was bewildered by a lot of the terminology in the recording section. It's interesting info that could benefit with some cross-linking to articles on recording technology, and some brief explanations inline.  Overdub, bounce and submixes are all terms that could benefit from this.  Thanks for your hard work. RainbowCrane  | Talk 03:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)