Wikipedia:Peer review/Bohemian Rhapsody/archive3

Bohemian Rhapsody

 * Previous peer review
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make it an FA and I would like some feedback on it before nominating. Is there anything seriously wrong? Are thee enough refs? Thanks, Top  Gear  Freak  14:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hang on a and ask someone to copyedit it before going to FA. As I wrote some of this, the prose will be far from perfect, and some people love displaying their perceived superiority by pointing that out in aggressive terms. The JPS talk to me  14:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep to reliable sources. Forums and fan pages are not reliable sources, and there's no way they would pass at FA. The JPS talk to me  15:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Getting sources, but looks better in order of peak position rather than alphabetical order. And I didn't see anything anout alphabetical order. Top Gear  Freak  14:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The table of chart positions should be in alphabetical order (see Record charts), and I think they should be sourced to reliable sources on every one of them.Frcm1988 (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)