Wikipedia:Peer review/Cambridge Union/archive1

The Cambridge Union
I've listed this article for peer review because it has been transferred over following a name change and has lost its previous reviews. The article has also been worked on substantially from different sources.

Thanks, Om285 (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Checking it User:Om285, the issues I find are:

I hoped this helped. Good luck with the article. Also I made my own peer review here so I would appreciate feedback. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Four citations in the lead section. If you are citing controversial info, I'd recommend you to change to something more general or indirect.
 * The third paragraph of modern developments lack citations.
 * 2016 development project has two one-sentence paragraphs. Try expanding or combine them. In past speakers and debates there is a link to an official website. That might fit better in sections like further reading, see also or external links.
 * Some citations are also lacking formatting.