Wikipedia:Peer review/Canadian heraldry/archive1

Canadian heraldry
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… there were some issues raised when I nominated for GA. I think the issues have been addressed, but I want to make sure the article is as good as it can possibly be before re-nomming.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.

Thanks, Prince of Canadat 12:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments by Thehelpfulone This is my first time reviewing, so if I get something wrong - don't be afraid to say so! The comments are a little short, because I'm still learning...


 * First section, History - there is too much whitespace from the image left over. Either expand this section or make the image smaller.
 * Grant Process is a broken link.
 * Make sure all cite webs use, publisher and access date.
 * Some short paragraphs of one or two sentences need expansion, otherwise merge them together.
 * Link checker shows 1 broken link, and a few references without access dates or publishers.

Hope this helps, The  Helpful  One  Review 14:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Much help, thank you! Prince of Canadat 14:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments from
 * "achievements—coats of arms—in" – "achievements, such as the coats of arms, in" – change to this to make it flow better; also, I'm assuming this is what is meant
 * "United States of America" – "United States"
 * remove the periods from image captions are not full sentences
 * brackets are used way too much in the article; merge them into the prose
 * there's too much "e.g.", "etc.", and whatnot. It's as if the sentences just give a few examples then trail off! Remove the "etc."
 * quotes should be double-quotes, not single-

Gary King ( talk ) 02:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ I think. Many thanks! [ roux  ] [ x ] 12:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)