Wikipedia:Peer review/Ceteris paribus/archive1

Ceteris paribus
This is a nice article. Is there more work that should be done?
 * It is well written. Right off the bat it needs sources and external links.Logophile 14:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)


 * It's a good article. The one sentence that threw me a little was the last in the "Ceteris paribus in economics" where an equals to (=) was used. It looks a little informal and should use equivalent english instead. Is there anything available on the historical origins of this phrase? Any books/literature for further reading? Thanks. &mdash; RJH 16:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)