Wikipedia:Peer review/Chia Thye Poh/archive1

Chia Thye Poh
It needs:

1) a photo of the subject.

2) information about his activities since full release in 1998.

3) access to this work might reveal some information - Hussin Mutalib (2003). Parties and Politics: A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore.

4) information about the full extent of his activities in 1966 that the got the government of Singapore so scared of him.

5) venues and timeframes for the places where he was detained in the period 1966-1989.

6) anything from his own inside story, although I don't believe he published memoirs.

7) the description of his religion for the infobox.

8) information about his public speeches, writings, and activities in the period from 1999 onward.

9) a source confirming that he was conferred with his Masters degree and his PhD.

10) confirmation of his exact year of birth. If it wasn't 1941, it was 1940 or 1942.

The biographical subject has a email address which I've messaged to. It is: chia@iss.nl I have no idea whether he is still in the Netherlands at the present time, or how freqently he has been back to Singapore. NonlisteningFriend 02:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Automated Peer Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 14:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
 * If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Persondata for more information.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * it has been
 * might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]