Wikipedia:Peer review/China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement/archive1

China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement


I've listed this article for peer review because a certain editor on WikiProject Pakistan has been working on it quite a bit and I thought it could benefit from peer review (I think it could be ready for a GAN soon).

Thanks, RealKnockout (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Review from Yeeno

 * Pinging, Will take a more thorough look at POV issues later, but from what I've heard, you're looking for sources from the Chinese perspective. Here are some English language sources I know of:
 * Xinhua English: Link - state-run news organization in China; you can often find the Chinese government's official stance in these articles.
 * People's Daily English: Link - another state-run organization, the official paper of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.
 * However, there are also , as they have been deprecated by the community for publishing false information or conspiracy theories:
 * CGTN - Global television network owned by the Chinese government.
 * Global Times - Newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, known as the "Fox News of China".
 * Let me know if you have any questions! Yee no   (talk) 🍁 06:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * None of those sources seemed to have anything on this article (all I could find was 1 sentence about how great the project was, which didn'tcite any numbers). I tried some google searches as well, but found nothing. I even tried the sources to avoid, but they had nothing either. Do you know of any other Chinese news sites? RealKnockout (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @RealKnockout: So far, I've found a series of press releases by the Chinese Foreign Ministry and an article from the People's Daily.  Yee no   (talk) 🍁 22:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this. I utilized the People's Daily Article for a paragraph on the first phase. I skimmed the press releases, will work on those later, although from a quick read it seems that most of the basic facts are covered. However, I will delve deeper into that later. Also, do you think splitting the 1st phase criticism sub-section into its own section is a good idea (i.e. a section titled "Critcism" with sub-sections on each phase and topic)? RealKnockout (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Per Criticism, we usually want to avoid sections dedicated to criticism as to maintain a neutral point of view. The guideline says we should incorporate positive and negative views into the same section, so perhaps you could do something like "Reception" or "Reactions". Yee no   (talk) 🍁 22:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * If you still have the data, the graph should be converted into one that uses Template:Graph:Chart. Displaying the data like this makes the graph easier to update and more accessible. The template page should have instructions and examples, but feel free to ask me if you need any help on this. Yee no   (talk) 🍁 06:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)