Wikipedia:Peer review/Chrysiridia rhipheus/archive1

Chrysiridia rhipheus
I've been working on this article a lot, and would like to know how to improve it more. Pro bug catcher 03:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's well-referenced and provides all the main details, but very short. Is there anything more that can be written about this moth (I know very little about the topic)? If not, then there doesn't seem much point in splitting it into multiple sections: there's only 3-4 paragraphs of information there, and stubby sections and paragraphs don't read well. Trebor 16:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've seen in two sources that it can be a migrating moth, but haven't understood completely (not enough to put it in Wikipedia), when I do understant I'll add it to the Range or Habits section. The paragraphs (even though stubby) were made to use the Lepidoptera Wikiproject Aticle formats. And by the way thanks for the review. What grade do you think it should be (Start, B, Good, A, FA... I can always dream)?Pro bug catcher 16:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, to be honest, I have no idea what grade it should be. I was never very good at this kind of thing. Could you ask someone on the Wikiproject to assess it? Trebor 19:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll try that. Thanks again.Pro bug catcher 02:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 23:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)