Wikipedia:Peer review/Citroën C3 Picasso/archive2

Citroën C3 Picasso
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because…I need feedback on changes since the last peer review and the progress made. Also if it's worth listing for FAC any time soon. I'd appreciate a complete breakdown of pretty much everything in list format, including spelling mistakes, odd sentences, badly worded sections, ways to improve things etc.
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments some quick overview comments.
 * Seems to be a lot of overlinking in the info box (e.g. litre is linked many times....) ✅
 * Infobox - "5-speed Manual transmission" no need for "manual" to be capitalised. ✅
 * Ref 12 (used in the lead for "competitors") doesn't seem to mention any of the competitors. ✅
 * Paragraph 1, line 3. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 10:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * "The company began selling the car" -> "The company began to sell the car..." ✅
 * "engine at €12,590" -> "engine, priced at .." ✅
 * What does "44 mpg-imp" mean to a non-expert?
 * I believe Miles per gallon is wikilinked in the first few instances, and the following imp is for it being an imperial measurement. Is that what you meant? Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I would wikilink to Fuel economy in automobiles but there's a convert template in use already there. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 17:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Concerned that the "Models" section reads like a brochure for Citroen, e.g. "is consistently the luxury trim for each market".... yuck. ✅
 * Engines table needs work for WP:DASH.
 * Tables should meet MOS:DTT for accessibility for screen readers.
 * "611 C3 Picassos built between" avoid starting sentences with a number. ✅
 * Capitalise "European car of the year" correctly. ✅
 * " quality at 3 stars." see WP:MOSNUM, should be "three stars". ✅
 * Worldwide 2011 sales not available?!
 * Check refs for dead links, I found a few...!
 * I found 2 from the Department for Transport that are under maintenance. Did you see any others not from this source? Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 13:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)