Wikipedia:Peer review/Comparison of operating systems/archive1

Comparison of operating systems
Needs to go under POV check, factual check and more... squash 04:16, Sep 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Maybe the Linux kernel type could be called "module-loading monolithic" linking directly to Linux_kernel. The prices should specify if that's street or manufacturer's suggested retail price. SUSE should probably mention the possibility of a support package. Might be worth a footnote that Fedora can be set up for NTFS support, but that it is considered experimental. (Is it not experimental on SUSE?) -- Mpolo 08:45, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * You can help by making your suggested changes on the article :-) squash 02:12, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * The price section makes it too US-centric. There must be a better way of doing that! - Ta bu shi da yu 14:08, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I can't really think of a better way either which doesn't compomise the information... squash 02:12, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * The row titled "Target audience" seems problematic. Paul August 14:29, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll agree with you on that one, but there is no way to make is sound less problematic... squash 02:12, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)