Wikipedia:Peer review/CornerShot/archive1

CornerShot
I think it is Good Article quality, but I want to know what my peers think before nominating it. I know it could use more info around the standard gun's section. Does anyone else see anything else wrong with the article? Gang sta  EB  (sliding logs~dive logs) 13:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * by Jon513


 * 1) The word new in the first sentences doesn't make any sense in an encyclopedia. Imagine if you were reading and old Britannica and it says a cotton gin is a new invention! Remove it or consider replacing it with "invented in whatever year".
 * 2) All of the pictures on the page are copyrighted and a fair use rational for all of them is questionable considering that the page it a bit crowded with pictures. I recommend removing all the picture except for one and put it in an (see Uzi submachine gun)
 * 3) This article fits into more categories, start by looking at other guns and see what categories they are in.
 * 4) The references should be change to a or  as appropriate.
 * 5) In general more reliable sources are need (a joke forum!)
 * 6) While there is no need to repeat everything said in Urban warfare there should be some discussion on the need to create such a weapon.
 * The preceding review was by Jon513 on 16:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * There is too many forms to just put in infobox weapon. Gang  sta  EB  (sliding logs~dive logs) 16:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * There are also variants of the Uzi. Jon513 05:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 14:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)