Wikipedia:Peer review/Cutman/archive1

Cutman
This is the first article I wrote completely from scratch without any template to follow. Any and all feedback would be appreciated. Thank you! --CasualFighter 21:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's a good, informative, well-written article, and one that very usefully fills a niche of missing information in the mixed martial arts sphere. Congratulations! I did find a few ways I think it could be improved however:-
 * I'm not entirely sure how, but I think the opening paragraph needs a re-think, bearing in mind the usual considerations of how much a reader who is ignorant of the general topic, or one who had come from an oblique link (e.g. someone following a link from the film article Million Dollar Baby), would understand the context. Although you've obviously written it with this in mind, I'm not sure it currently goes quite far enough.  It's not really clear for example, if we assume the reader knows nothing about combat sports, that cutmen operate only during the breaks between rounds!
 * Nothing I've seen in the article explains *why* cuts stop fights (i.e. what are the safety considerations that cause combat sport fights to be stopped on cuts), and which ones are more likely to stop them than others. This is a central discussion for this article... although it's almost begging to be, or be part of a separate article and have a summary section here.  It may already exist - whatever, it needs to be part of this article or linked and highlighted here.  Let me know if you need help on this.
 * I would like to see inline reference links, I think this would make the references a lot more usable and help kickstart a reader's personal research.
 * Vaseline may be a genericised trademark in most of the English-speaking world, but unless the non-brand term for it is unrecognisable, I still think it's better/safer to refer to it by it's non-brand name (in this case, Petroleum jelly). Or perhaps Vaseline (petroleum jelly) in the article.
 * The article could generally do with more wikification of terms. For example, there's a solid article on Nosebleeds (which is also the article for Broken Nose).  Even some terms that currently don't seem to have an article could do with a wiki-link where an article would be useful - what about Athletic Commission, a term that would not be immediately understandable even to many semi-informed readers?  The article could be wikified a lot more than it currently is, and I think this would be of use to many readers.  Again, this is an area I feel qualified to help directly with if you wish assistance.
 * To cover the entirety of a subject, you need to think laterally. Cutmen (or at least corner-men acting in a cutman capacity) have been important in fiction - Million Dollar Baby, Rocky, probably several others.  A "cutmen in fiction" section would probably be good.

That's all that occurs to me for now, I hope it's helpful. Good show. --Estarriol talk 15:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I think this is an interesting article, but it's got a big problem in that it talks about normal practices for cutmen and such without citing any reference works on their practices or routines. Is it just your opinion and observations or did you get it from reading a book?  If it came from books and magazines, or documentaries, the article needs to cite them, otherwise it's full of original research. Night Gyr 00:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * My bad, I missed the section at the end of references. This is why inline cites are useful.  More inline cites mean that it'll be easier to see where you're drawing your facts from. Night Gyr 00:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)