Wikipedia:Peer review/Daft Punk/archive1

Daft Punk
This article has evolved a lot in the past year. Several of the contributors to the article have provided good info about the band for the past few months. I just wanted to know if there's anything that needs to be fixed or tweaked or even added into the article. Perhaps areas where a more in depth description can be made. Douglasr007 07:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, this is right next to the other article I'm commenting on. Here goes...
 * Improve the lead section; it should be able to stand on its own. See Lead section and next comment.
 * Try to put the article in context. Could the style of the music be described in more detail? What is their place within their genre / related genres, or the music scene in general? (What will they be remembered for, historically?) What about musicians they were influenced by / have influenced? I would think entire new sections could be created discussing these.
 * Please, please, please no trivia sections. See Trivia and WikiProject Music/MUSTARD as guidelines continue to develop. Work relevant information into the context of other sections.
 * So you've bought into the "band logo in infobox" trend? In the long run, I'm fairly certain there is going to be backlash against this. Just a heads-up. –Unint 23:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Please elabourate on this "backlash". To me it seems like the lead infobox is the perfect place for a logo. —(chubbstar) — talk

Ok, I changed the infobox for the band info but I have no idea what to do with the Trivia section. Could a section of cultural references be made for some of the trivia? I know I could delete some of the trivia bits since it's just refers to one of the artists and not the group itself. Douglasr007 09:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * If you could expand the article to discuss some of the things I suggested, I think you would be able to find natural places for the more important information among the trivia. I would seriously place that as the greater priority. –Unint 03:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 15:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)