Wikipedia:Peer review/Death's Game/archive1

Death's Game


I've listed this article for peer review because I need to know what part of the page needs improvement and if it is ready to nominate as a Good Article candidate.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   03:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, some feedback:
 * Possibly could use a bit more detail in the synopsis. Info about setting in particular; is it set in modern South Korea?
 * Reply: I can't find a reliable source be it in English or Korean about the particular setting of the series but I expanded the synopsis.
 * Per MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE, translated quotes should include original Korean-language text somewhere
 * Reply: I put the original Korean-language text on the citation and underlined it. I also add more reviews.
 * Forgot where in the MOS this is, but I'm spotting some punctuation just before closing quotes, and these appear to be translated quotes. Generally punct should be expected to be before closing quotes only if the punct matches what the original quote had; otherwise I think it's safe to default to doing punct after the quote mark.
 * Reply: ✅
 * Currencies are currently wikilinked multiple times; likely unnecessary per MOS:OVERLINK I think.
 * Reply: ✅
 * Preference thing, but I think in the episode list table maybe consider doing a line break in between the english title, korean title, and transliterated title. I'd also consider swapping the order of the transliterated and korean title, and omitting the "Korean" and "Transliteration" labels after the first, but I think debatable.
 * Reply: Per Template:Episode list it can't be done.
 * Otherwise I think has a solid shot of getting GA! 104.232.119.107 (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Edit: Thanks for giving some feedbacks. All done.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   12:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * One note; to my understanding synopses do not need to be sourced per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 20:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * There are still some grammar errors in the article, but the content and style otherwise seems good to me. I can go through and do a quick revision; otherwise I think this is ready for a GA nom. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Done and thanks for revising some contents.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   09:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720
Comments after a quick skim:
 * Reception section follows the "X says Y" pattern. I suggest that you read WP:RECEPTION for tips on how to avoid this.
 * Keep looking for more sources taking about this TV series's development and casting. There should also be more information on how the music of the series was developed.
 * The lede should include some information on the series's reception.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 14:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments, I will get it done in the upcoming days.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   15:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Bai0926
While it is mentioned that the manga is highly regarded, there is a lack of specific references to reader comments or media reviews. Adding these would give readers a better sense of the popularity and influence of the work. Bai0926 (talk) 05:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)