Wikipedia:Peer review/Debra Ruh/archive1

Debra Ruh
I've listed this article for peer review because it was originally sent to AfD for being too promotional in nature, but received a significant rewrite and expansion with sources from (see original version here) and was voted as keep just now. On the talk page though commented that "the article needs a major trimming", and in response, I have decided to seek a formal review process - which has the additional side-benefit of evaluating the reworked article for potential GA status.

Thanks, &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I see the the request was archived, and then returned. It would be lovely to get at least some high level feedback about the current state of the article.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 13:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * References 29 and 30 are dead, both are links to the whitehouse.gov site. The cited material is possibly still available at the archived site at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/open -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Update It looks like none of the submitted material was saved — I am not able to find it through searches or going through the menus.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
 * The following is the result of an automated review - http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/view/Peer_reviewer#page:Debra_Ruh
 * Consider adding more links to the article; per Manual of Style (links) and Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
 * Update ✅–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Image use policy and fit under one of the Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
 * Update I'll see if maybe I could find something about disability, adaptive technology, or other related topics that might apply here.
 * If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
 * Update I wasn't able to find one for Ruh and added a photo request on the talk page. I'll send out an email request for an image to one of Ruh's organizations.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
 * Update It was within a comment, but I went ahead and spelled it out.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
 * I hope it's useful. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, that was useful guidance, thanks for taking time to compile the list! The peer request was opened because a user thought "the article needs a major trimming". Do you have an opinion about that?–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * the section about the TecAccess company could possibly be trimmed, if there are sufficient good sources to sustain a separate article about it. I'll try to throw something on a page at Draft:TecAccess, just to see if it could be viable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * , thanks. Yes, it looks to me as if there are sufficient sources to start a separate article. I'll start drafting the content.–CaroleHenson (talk) 08:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * see Draft:TecAccess, where I made a start. I also added a list of possible sources that we can use to expand the draft. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * , Oh, wow, thanks. I will work on it.–CaroleHenson (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)