Wikipedia:Peer review/Decapolis/archive2

Decapolis
I am resubmitting this for review; see the Peer review/Decapolis/archive1. I have been the main contributor, but I believe that it may be ready to be a FAC. Any thoughts or suggestions? Fishal 03:40, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * It's really cool that there is a map now (that was one of my comments in the previous PR request). However, what I don't like about that map is that it (1) is released under a non-free license and (2) contains an url and a site name. Especially (1) is something that doesn't fare so well on FAC.  &mdash; mark &#9998; 07:57, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Even though we have permission to use it? (The URL has to stay because we don't have permission to alter it). Fishal 19:17, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * The map maybe copyrighted, but the locations sure aren't. I could trace out the image outline and locations and upload it under GFDL. Anybody interested? Let me know on my talk page. == 20:38, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cool! That's the best solution of course; and I think you can do a better job than they did (the present map is very grainy and low in resolution).
 * Re:Fishal &mdash; yes, it's a problem even though we have permission to use it because this permission is incompatible with our GFDL license (hence 'non-free'). There is an ongoing debate whether Wikipedia should allow this kind of limited permission images at all; they make it more difficult to distribute Wikipedia as a whole under the GFDL.  &mdash; mark &#9998; 20:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I've made a new map based on the old one. I hope you'll didn't have any high expectations on my map skills. (I'm a novice at cartography). I've also deleted the old map since it was non free. (It can always be restored). == 18:00, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

Now that the image is fixed, are there any other problems with the article that should be addressed? Fishal 03:22, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The mention to the decapolis in the bible could use some changes, in my opinion. Matthew also mentions it, and some might not understand the importance of the herd of pigs comment.  That either could be expanded to talk about why that means they were in "gentile" areas, or it just could be removed and more general information about Jesus' ministry be given.  The biblical accounts, granted, don't give much, so while it's important to mention, it's ok if it's short, just as long as it's clear.  --Spangineer &#8734; 06:45, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)


 * The article is shorter than most other Featured Articles, perhaps you could expand it by talking more about the culture of the Decapolis cities? (specifically, could you talk more about the religious life of the region?) Perhaps you could talk about the history of the archeological digs in the area too?Dinopup 01:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)