Wikipedia:Peer review/Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries/archive1

dextro-Transposition of the great arteries
I'd like to get this article up to featured article quality. Aside from the red links (which I am currently working on), I would like to get some feedback on any/all other areas that the article needs work. Thanks in advance. bcatt 04:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.


 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)


 * Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&amp;nbsp;mm.


 * As per WP:MOS, please do not link words in headings.


 * Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.


 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
 * You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
 * Thanks, Andy t 22:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Notes on the applicability of the auto generated suggestions above:
 * Infobox: the page had an info box, but it was not at the very top of the page (moved now)
 * Does the  apply non-distance/weight measurements? (ie: "18 weeks") - these are the only type on this page that may be applicable.
 * There was a linked heading (removed)
 * The ToC is rather long and I will work on summarizing some of the main headings and creating new articles to go into greater detail.
 * Thanks for teaching me how to do footnotes properly! :D
 * How do I have it copyedited?
 * Thanks for all your help and suggestions...I will look over the pages you suggested and look at having it copyedited (once I figure that part out).

bcatt 17:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Great job! The infobox comment was caused because  didn't render with the javascript. The nbsp thing was probably caused by an error; no non-breaking spaces are required in this article. Copyediting means simply to double check for spelling and grammar problems. (User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a contains comprehensive suggestions + exercises for reaching criterion 2(a) of WP:WIAFA). Andy t
 * Wow, that was a whole lot... to respond, I agree that Treatment of dextro-transposition of the great arteries would be the simplest, though it would probably be better to bring this up on the talk page. Preferably, exact wording shouldn't be used, as it reduces the point of having a subpage, but then again I have seen articles that have done that, so I guess it is acceptable. About the copyediting, it would be good to get a fresh pair of eyes - not much more to say there, as you explained it yourself. Andy t 17:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)