Wikipedia:Peer review/Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks/archive1

Dragon Ball Z: The History of Trunks

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because…

I want to delevep the article further and I have but I'm having problems with adding reliable sources. On the plus side the Cast, Music, Plot and Intro sections are complete and they're okay. But for reception I cannot find any sources that are deemed reliable. I've googled it many times and can't find any reviews that I think constitute as professional and reliable. I want to get this to FA status sometime but I need all the advice and help I can get. Please point me in the right direction.

If for some reason some information cannot be accessed becuase it has not been released will this affect the FA potential this article has? If articles such as Spoo and aXXo can get to FA and GA respectively I am sure this article can get to FA some day. Just like the articles mentioned since sources are limited all the info that has been gathered, I'm sure, will make this GA in the least. It cannot be penalised if such information is rare or has not been published explicitly.

I want help in the following areas:


 * Reception
 * Production (on its own, excluding Cast and Music)

Thanks, Dumbledore  14:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Neither Spoo nor aXXo is a featured article. They are both only good articles. Featured articles are on a whole different level. I'm afraid this article will never become featured. As for sources, one review is already listed in the external links section. It doesn't belong there. It should be citing a sentence or two in the reception section. It also seems that Anime News Network has reviewed the film. With those two you should be able to write a very basic reception section. -- Goodraise (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well at one time Spoo was a FA article. Will this ever become a Good Article instead? Dumbledore  18:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's possible. It mostly depends on the sources you find. If two reviews is all there is, then probably not. Good luck. -- Goodraise (talk) 18:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've expanded this section into 3 suitable sized paragraphs based on 3 reviews from 2 websites. I think this is enough for the section until I find more (possibly), do you agree that its fine now? Dumbledore  19:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think you squeezed too much out of those three reviews. Look at featured articles about films, like 300 (film). They write far less. -- Goodraise (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

The differences between film and manga are very original research. It probably needs to be removed.Tintor2 (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, I didn't add that section but wasn't too sure if it could be deleted. Now it's confirmed I'll delete it. Dumbledore  20:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Can I get more advice? Dumbledore 17:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Was the film really written by Chuck Norris? -- Goodraise (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The music section needs some explanation. The film itself has no tracks. You'll have to give the name of the CD and its release date. -- Goodraise (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay. I'll expand these sections and add references, I'll also fix the infobox. Dumbledore  19:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)