Wikipedia:Peer review/Enya/archive1

Enya



 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 03:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it is a good article for the FA. It has all the references.

Thanks, Ineversigninsodonotmessageme (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Ineversigninsodonotmessageme

Here are my suggetions to improving the article: I don't think this is ready for FA status because a lot of statements need referencing. Biomedeng (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * References are not properly formatted per the MOS. Also all websites need an accessed date listed by them in the references.
 * At least one place has a space between the sentence period and the reference
 * Several places do not have sufficient inline reference (example: the part about what her parents did has no citation) and there are complete paragraphs without citations
 * The article has several citation needed tags that need references
 * The comment that Enya is a very private person seems rather subjective and not verifiable.