Wikipedia:Peer review/Est and The Forum in popular culture/archive1

Est and The Forum in popular culture
This article was recently reviewed and successfully listed as a Good Article. The GA reviewer said it was an enjoyable read, but could use some minor improvements in the area of copyediting. I'm looking to get some input from a fresh set of eyes as to how to best improve this article's quality status. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 04:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC).


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 12:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will begin to address some of the points from the semi-auto Peer Review, and note them here below.  Cirt (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * Addressing points from semi-auto Peer Review
 * 1) Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?] - ✅ - Lead is already sufficient.  Cirt (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * 2) If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?] - ✅ - This was a good suggestion, I added a free use image to the top of the article.  Cirt (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * 3) There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Person, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) - ✅ - Not sure if there is an appropriate infobox for this type of article, but if I do find one I'll add it later.  Cirt (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * 4) Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?] - ✅ - All full dates within the article text are wikilinked, though there may be some full dates in citations that are not.  Cirt (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * 5) As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?] - ✅ - I went and looked through the whole article, but it looks like footnotes are already located after punctuation.  Cirt (talk) 13:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC).
 * 6) Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 12:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)