Wikipedia:Peer review/Federal Bureau of Investigation/archive1

FBI
I would like this review so it could become an FA. So just give me all the "review" status information, and I will fix it up. :) --Shane (T - C - E) (S/At) 03:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Per WP:MOS, the first letters of words in heading should not be capitalized unless: 1) it is a proper noun or 2) it is the first word of the heading. (Note that "Directors" should not be capitalized, which is also done a couple of times in the prose also)


 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.


 * Images with fair use tags need fair use rationales - please see WP:FUC.


 * Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.


 * Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article. (Here, "Other Facts")


 * Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like and  may be useful here.


 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.


 * This article is a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form).


 * There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.


 * There are several paragraphs that are too short, which sometimes disrupts the flow of the article. These should either be expanded or merged.


 * Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, years, decades, and centuries without full dates generally should not be linked. For example, January 2006  should not be linked, instead change it to January 2006. Also, please note WP:BTW and WP:CONTEXT, which state that years with full dates should be linked. For example, February 28, 2006,  should be come February 28, 2006. 


 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * Thanks, AndyZ t 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, I am on the case! --Shane (T - C - E) 16:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)